Yes — a Western & Southern survivorship (second-to-die) policy can be sold in a life settlement when both the policyholder and the policy qualify, and the insurance company’s permission is not required to do it. A life insurance contract is personal property that its owner may transfer, which is why the carrier’s role at closing is clerical: it records a change of owner and beneficiary after the transaction is finished. What actually decides whether a sale is possible is the economics of the contract and the health of the two people insured under it.
Survivorship coverage is the hardest category in the secondary market, and it is worth saying that plainly before you spend a month gathering paperwork. A second-to-die policy pays nothing until both insureds have died. A buyer therefore has to underwrite two separate life expectancies and model the joint mortality of the pair, and because two people are unlikely to die close together, the expected wait for the death benefit stretches out. Longer waits mean more premium outlay and a lower present value, so survivorship offers are generally smaller than single-life offers on the same face amount — and fewer institutional buyers bid at all.
This page is educational. Pine Lake Life Solutions is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting for Western & Southern Financial Group or any of its member companies, and nothing here is legal, tax, or investment advice. If you want to know where a specific contract stands, send the policy cover page for a free review or call (305) 209-7183.
In This Article
- Which Western & Southern Company Actually Issued the Contract?
- Why Two Insureds Changes the Math So Much
- When a Second-to-Die Policy Stops Doing Its Job
- After the First Death: The Policy You Now Own Is Different
- Trust Ownership, Trustees, and Who Signs
- Crummey Notices and the Trust File Nobody Kept
- Documents, Contestability, and Timing
- Honest Alternatives Before You Sell
- Frequently Asked Questions

Which Western & Southern Company Actually Issued the Contract?
Western & Southern Financial Group is a Cincinnati-based mutual holding company whose roots go back to 1888, and it is not a single insurer. It is a family of life companies — Western-Southern Life Assurance Company, The Western and Southern Life Insurance Company, Columbus Life, Lafayette Life, Integrity Life, and National Integrity Life among them. Each is a separate legal entity with its own product shelf, its own service center, and its own forms.
That matters more on a survivorship case than on an ordinary one. Second-to-die products inside the group were historically distributed through the estate-planning channels rather than the career agency force, so a survivorship contract in a Western & Southern household may have been issued by Columbus Life or Lafayette Life even though the family remembers it as “the Western & Southern policy.” Read the issuing company name off the cover page rather than off the envelope. As of 2026, verify with the servicing company whether survivorship coverage is still being written or whether the block is closed and simply being administered in force — treat any product name you find in old marketing material as historical, not current.
If you also hold single-life coverage from an affiliated company, the analysis there is different and usually more favorable; see our page on selling a Lafayette Life whole life policy.
Why Two Insureds Changes the Math So Much
On a single-life policy, a buyer estimates one life expectancy, projects the premiums needed to keep the contract in force over that horizon, and discounts the death benefit back to today. On a survivorship policy the same machinery runs twice and then has to be combined. Both insureds are medically underwritten, each gets a life expectancy report, and the pricing model works out the probability distribution of the second death.
Joint mortality is stubborn. Even when one spouse is in poor health, the projected payout date is governed by whichever of the two lives longer, and healthy longevity in the surviving spouse pushes the whole valuation out. Every extra year of projected wait adds another year of premium the buyer must fund and another year of discounting. That is the structural reason survivorship offers sit below single-life offers, and why a family with a $1,000,000 second-to-die policy should not assume the same percentage they read about in general life settlement articles.
General market ranges still frame the outer edges: across the market as a whole, sellers have historically received somewhere in the range of 10% to 35% of face value, and the U.S. Government Accountability Office’s market study (GAO-10-775) found settlement proceeds averaging roughly four to eight times cash surrender value. Survivorship cases tend to land toward the low end of that band, and some draw no offer at all. Our explainer on how buyers price a policy walks through the mechanics.
When a Second-to-Die Policy Stops Doing Its Job
Most survivorship policies were sold to solve one narrow problem: paying a federal estate tax bill that would come due after the second spouse died, without forcing heirs to liquidate a business, a farm, or real estate. Several things can quietly retire that job.
- The exemption moved past the estate. Federal estate-tax exemption levels have risen substantially since many of these policies were written in the 1990s and 2000s. An estate that was once clearly taxable may no longer be. Confirm current exemption figures with a tax advisor for the year in question rather than relying on the number the agent used at issue.
- The ILIT is no longer needed. If the trust was created purely to hold the policy and keep the death benefit outside the taxable estate, and the estate is no longer taxable, the trust may be maintaining an expensive asset for no remaining purpose.
- One insured has already died. The policy still exists, but its character has changed completely — see the next section.
- The business reason dissolved. Second-to-die policies also fund buy-sell agreements and family business succession. When the partner is bought out or the company is sold, the funding obligation can disappear with it. Our page on a buy-sell arrangement after a partner is bought out covers that scenario.
- The premiums outgrew the household. Many survivorship contracts were illustrated with optimistic interest assumptions and now require far more premium than projected.
After the First Death: The Policy You Now Own Is Different
When one of the two insureds dies, a survivorship contract does not pay anything, but it does change shape economically. From a buyer’s perspective the policy has effectively become a single-life policy on the surviving insured, because only one death remains between today and the claim. That collapses the joint-mortality problem and usually improves value, sometimes dramatically, depending on the survivor’s age and health.
It also changes the paperwork. There is often a required notification to the carrier, and some contracts adjust the cost-of-insurance structure or the premium pattern after the first death. Ask the servicing company for a current in-force illustration that reflects the death of the first insured — an illustration run before the death will misstate the premium schedule you actually face.
Practically, this is the moment when many families first look at the policy seriously. A surviving spouse in her eighties, holding a second-to-die contract that no longer serves any estate purpose and carries a premium she is paying out of a fixed income, is the single most common survivorship settlement candidate. Our page on what happens to a survivorship policy after the first death goes deeper, and the first-year widow’s financial checklist puts it in context with the other decisions arriving at the same time.
| Factor | Single-Life Policy | Survivorship (Second-to-Die) |
|---|---|---|
| Lives underwritten | One | Two, plus joint mortality modeling |
| Typical buyer interest | Broad | Narrower; fewer providers bid |
| Offer level vs. face | Often mid-range of 10-35% | Usually lower end of the range, or no offer |
| Effect of first death | N/A | Behaves like single life on the survivor; value often improves |
| Usual owner | The insured | Irrevocable life insurance trust |
| Who signs | Policy owner | Trustee, sometimes with beneficiary consent |
| Contestability | Two years from issue | Two years from issue, both insureds |

Trust Ownership, Trustees, and Who Signs
The great majority of survivorship policies are owned by an irrevocable life insurance trust rather than by the insureds personally — that was the entire design. If your policy is trust-owned, you are not the seller. The trustee is, acting on behalf of the trust’s beneficiaries.
That produces a specific set of requirements before anything can move. A buyer will want a complete copy of the trust instrument, evidence of who is currently serving as trustee (including any successor-trustee appointments), and confirmation that the trust document actually grants the power to sell or otherwise dispose of trust property. Some trusts require beneficiary consent, notice, or a written non-objection; some name a trust protector with a say. If the trustee is an individual family member rather than a bank, expect questions about capacity and about whether the trustee understands the fiduciary duty involved.
None of this is a reason to stop — trust-owned settlements close routinely. It is a reason to loop in the attorney who drafted the trust early rather than at the closing table. See selling an ILIT- or trust-owned policy and consent requirements in an irrevocable trust.
Crummey Notices and the Trust File Nobody Kept
Here is the practical snag that surprises families. ILITs funded by annual gifts rely on Crummey withdrawal rights: each year the trustee is supposed to send beneficiaries written notice of their temporary right to withdraw the contribution, which is what makes the gift a present interest eligible for the annual gift-tax exclusion. Those notices are supposed to be kept in the trust file.
Twenty-five years later, they very often are not. A buyer’s counsel reviewing a trust-owned survivorship policy will ask for the trust’s administrative history, and gaps in Crummey documentation raise questions about how cleanly the trust has been administered — not because the buyer is auditing your gift-tax position, but because sloppy trust records correlate with unclear authority to sell. Reconstruct what you can, and let your own attorney advise on any gift-tax exposure; that is a legal and tax question, not a settlement question. Our page on missing Crummey notices covers the cleanup.
Documents, Contestability, and Timing
Three documents drive a survivorship review: the policy cover page, a current in-force illustration from the issuing company, and medical authorizations for both insureds (or for the survivor, if the first death has occurred). The in-force illustration is the workhorse — it projects what premium is required to carry the contract to various ages, which is exactly the number a buyer needs. Request it in writing and ask for several premium scenarios, not just the current billed amount. See what an in-force illustration is and our script for requesting one.
Two timing rules matter. First, essentially every life policy carries a two-year contestability period after issue, during which the insurer can investigate and rescind for material misstatements on the application; buyers do not want to purchase a contract the carrier could still contest, so policies inside that window are generally set aside. On a survivorship policy the clock runs from issue, not from a death. Second, the transaction itself takes time — plan on roughly 60 to 120 days from application to funded payment, with medical records and the in-force illustration the usual bottlenecks. Related reading: the contestability period and the step-by-step process.
Honest Alternatives Before You Sell
A settlement is one exit among several, and it is not always the best one. If the death benefit is still needed and the premium is affordable, keeping the policy is the right answer, and no page on this site should talk you out of it. If the goal is only to stop paying, a survivorship contract with cash value may offer reduced paid-up or extended-term nonforfeiture options that end premiums while preserving some coverage. If the trust simply wants out, surrender is fast — but it pays only the cash surrender value, which is the number any settlement offer has to beat. Compare the two directly on our settlement versus cash surrender value page.
There is also a size floor. Very small survivorship contracts, or policies with heavy outstanding loans that would be netted out of any offer, frequently draw no bids at all. That is not a failure of effort; it is the market telling you the economics do not work. See minimum policy size and when keeping the policy is the right answer. A free review will tell you which category your contract falls into before you invest weeks in it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need Western & Southern’s permission to sell a survivorship policy?
No. The policy is property owned by you or by the trust that holds it, and ownership can be transferred without the insurer’s approval. The issuing company’s role is administrative: it processes the change-of-owner and change-of-beneficiary forms after the sale closes. Pine Lake is not affiliated with Western & Southern or its member companies.
Why are survivorship offers lower than single-life offers?
Because nothing is paid until both insureds have died. A buyer must underwrite two life expectancies, model the joint mortality, and fund premiums over a longer expected holding period. Longer horizons and more premium outlay reduce present value, so second-to-die offers generally come in below what the same face amount would draw on a single life.
One spouse has already died. Is the policy worth more now?
Often yes. After the first death the contract behaves economically like a single-life policy on the surviving insured, which removes the joint-mortality drag. Ask the servicing company for a fresh in-force illustration reflecting the first death, because premium requirements can change at that point.
The policy is owned by our ILIT. Can it still be sold?
Usually, but the trustee is the seller, not you. A buyer will want the full trust instrument, proof of who is currently serving as trustee, and confirmation that the trust grants authority to dispose of assets. Some trusts also require beneficiary notice or consent, so involve the drafting attorney early.
We never kept the Crummey notices. Is that a problem?
It is a common gap and rarely fatal to a transaction, but it does invite questions during document review. Reconstruct what records you can and ask your own attorney about any gift-tax implications, since that is a legal and tax question rather than a settlement question.
Which Western & Southern company issued my policy?
Read the issuing company name printed on the policy cover page. Western & Southern Financial Group includes several separate insurers, and survivorship contracts were often written by an affiliate rather than the flagship company. As of 2026, confirm with that specific service center whether the block is still open or closed to new business.
How long does a survivorship settlement take?
Plan on roughly 60 to 120 days from application to funded payment. Survivorship cases can run toward the longer end because medical records are needed for two insureds and trust documentation adds a review layer. Funds should be held by an independent escrow agent until the ownership change is confirmed.
What do I send to find out if our policy qualifies?
Just the policy cover page, which shows the issuing company, policy number, face amount, issue date, and the names of both insureds. That is enough for a free, no-obligation review. Call (305) 209-7183 if you would rather talk it through first.
Find out what your policy is worth — free, confidential, no obligation.
A 15-minute educational review covers your eligibility, every alternative, and a realistic view of what each path would net you.
Related Reading
- Can I Sell A Survivorship Life Policy
- Survivorship Policy First Death
- Sell Ilit Trust Owned Policy
- Irrevocable Trust Sell Policy Consent
- Crummey Notices Missing
- What Is An In Force Illustration
- Request In Force Illustration Script
- What Is The Contestability Period
- Sell My Lafayette Life Whole Life Policy
- How Life Settlement Buyers Price A Policy
Pine Lake Life Solutions does not purchase life insurance policies and does not provide legal, tax, or investment advice. Information provided is for educational purposes only. Eligibility for any option, including life settlements, is not guaranteed and depends on individual circumstances, policy terms, underwriting, and market conditions. Consult independent legal, tax, or financial professionals before making decisions regarding a life insurance policy.